Raashi Mohan - Dead Zones

“Dead zones” are areas of large bodies of water, typically occurring in the ocean, that lack the necessary amount of dissolved oxygen to support marine life. Historically, many of these sites were naturally occurring. However, recently there have been increased instances of these zones expanding and new ones being created. This is likely triggered by the process of eutrophication, caused by an excess of plant nutrients due to runoff from the land. These excess nutrients often cause rapid increases in the density of phytoplankton, a phenomenon known as an algal bloom, which allows small heterotrophs, such as zooplankton, to proliferate. Eventually, as phytoplankton and zooplankton die, the large amount of decomposition exhaust the water’s supply of dissolved oxygen.

Low levels of oxygen have several different effects on marine organisms. Many fish face reproductive problems, such as low egg counts and a lack of spawning. This occurs because the hypoxic (low-oxygen) conditions activate certain genes that lead to smaller reproductive organs. Additionally, bottom-dwelling organisms, such as clams and lobsters are unable to escape the potential suffocation, as they are quickly rendered unconscious and too slow to flee. However, jellyfish thrive in these situations, often present in vast numbers. Unfortunately, the mass amounts of jellyfish produce excess mucus and waste.

Fortunately, dead zones are reversible if their causes are largely reduced or eliminated. For example, after a large decline in the number of chemical fertilizers used in Russia, a large dead zone in the Black Sea mostly disappeared. Additionally, in the U.S., dead zones have been reduced in the Hudson River and San Francisco Bay as a result of major clean-up efforts. The Mississippi Basin/Gulf of Mexico Water Nutrient Task Force has been busy monitoring the large dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico and recommending ways to reduce it. However, as industrial and agricultural activity continues to increase, these clean-up efforts have an increasingly important job.

Food for Thought:
What are some ways in which people can reduce the occurrence of these "dead zones"?
In what ways can these zones have economic ramifications?
What are some other factors (other than runoff) that cause these zones?

Sources:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/dead_zone_(ecology).htm
https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/gulf-of-oman-marine-dead-zone-1.4645018
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ocean-dead-zones/



Comments

Anonymous said…
Even though we have no one to blame but ourselves, it is always saddening to hear about the anthropogenic causes of environmental issues. Just by using organic fertilizers, we can reduce the risk of phenomena such as dead zones: this wouldn’t even take all that much effort, and its disheartening to see such a large-scale problem spout from humans. In an emergency situation where we would begin clearing algal blooms with our own resources, costs would drive up immensely, and it would be a bother to the nation’s economy. Instead, we could begin to switch to organics that don’t create toxic runoff: small changes like this could help prevent the large scale destruction that is visualized in the picture you attached.
Anonymous said…
Of course Jellyfish thrive in the areas with little to no oxygen. I’m not sure why that is humorous to me, but here we are. I agree with Emily, it is sad to hear the negative impact we can have on the environment, but it is reassuring that we have been able to witness the disappearance of some of these Dead Zones. I wonder if there is some way to modify how we take care of runoff from agricultural areas? Could it be that a combination of leaning off of synthetic fertilizers and controlling excess runoff would create the positive factors we need to begin to bring the Dead Zones back to life.


(I’m quite proud of that last line. I feel clever)
Anonymous said…
It’s easy to joke about the jellyfish problem that the state of the oceans is causing, but jellyfish swarms are a very real problem- notably in asian waters such as those in Japan. Aside from dead zones, they thrive in areas with high pollution, decimating local fish populations. This can have a direct impact on the human economy, posing a threat to the fishing industry as a whole. On the positive side, at least solving issues such as dead zones and jellyfish swarms are more than feasible, and as you stated, are already starting to take effect in some places. Let’s hope this reduction and restoration continues rather than reversing.
Anonymous said…
Putting the focal point to resolving the issue by tracking down the causes of such instances should be an urgent matter. As mentioned, the reduction in usage of chemical fertilizers ought to be seen as a critically important point that our government should focus on. Humans nowadays are quite insensitive to problems that may eventually spread to result in worldwide pollution and contamination and fail to recognize that the causes are what we should focus on. We keep have to push for the laws and policies that are tied to preserving and maintaining the environment that we have right now, or perhaps make it better.
Anonymous said…
This was a very informative post on one more effect which human activities can have on our environment. Ways to reduce runoff include limiting the amounts of fertilizers and pesticides that way excess amounts of nutrients do not build up in streams/oceans. Sadly, around 10% of our oceans include dead zones, or oxygen poor regions. If industries do not take action on this issue, seafood consumption will drop due to the fact that 30% of it is from the Gulf of Mexico and this area is currently under a lot of stress. Thus, it is imperative that humans take action to reduce runoff in order to benefit the environment and for our own good!
Anonymous said…
The influx of dead zones caused by human activity is a major problem, but luckily it is easy to identify a feasible solution. Because some dead zones are naturally created, the goal does not need to be to stop every single dead zone from occurring. Rather, the goal just needs to be to prevent human activity, specifically the land runoff you mentioned, from creating extra dead zones than what is naturally created. As you pointed out, when Russia had a decline in the number of chemical fertilizers used, a dead zone disappeared. This proves that by simply cutting down on chemical fertilizer usage, human induced dead zones can be reduced greatly.
Anonymous said…
I'm glad to hear that this dead zone issue has a plausible solution. Like many environmental problems, dead zones occur naturally but the issue is when they have anthropogenic causes. Thankfully, the solution is fairly simple: regulate commercial fertilizer runoff. Just as long as we are mindful with how much fertilizer we use and the consequences of eutrophication, human-caused dead zones will be at a minimum. It's clear that the solution works because of the decrease in dead zones in the US and in Russia. By limiting the spread of human reach, we can limit our negative impact on the environment.
Anonymous said…
It is interesting how simple human actions, such as adding fertilizer to crops, can have such an enormous impact on the environment. The key to reducing both the size and number of dead zones in the coast is too simply reduce the input of nutrients into the ocean, as well as feeding bodies of water. To reduce the input of nutrients, we can better manage nutrient application (by controlling for amount, timing, and method), planting cover crops (crops that recycle excess nutrients), planting buffers (which absorb and filter out nutrients), and reducing how often fields are tilled (which reduces runoff). Few organisms tend to survive in dead zones, as most require oxygen to live. Additionally, the cause of dead zones can vary depending on the region. For example, dead zones in developing countries in Latin America, Asia, and Africa, are caused by minimally regulated wastewater disposal.
Anonymous said…
It is always disheartening to read about the human impact on the environment, especially when it comes to marine life. Contrastly, it is also fortunate that the causes of dead zones can be reversed if anthropogenic activity is regulated and prevented from contributing to them. Hopefully, by reducing the use of chemical fertilizers, which in turn reduces the presence of excess nutrients in runoff, the issue can be alleviated significantly. Even though this solution may not exactly support our economy or maximize business profits, there is definitely a larger environmental picture that we need to pay more attention to when considering the sustainability of the environments around us.
Anonymous said…
This was a very interesting read as I did not have prior knowledge of the gravity of this occurrence. Despite this, it is good to hear that there is a simple solution to this problem. Several environmental issues, such as dead zones, are caused by anthropogenic issues. The solution to this is to reduce the fertilizer runoff. One was to do this is to use organic fertilizers. Organic fertilizers lack the high levels of nitrogen and carbon that regular fertilizers have. This will reduce the amount of hazardous runoff that occurs due to these anthropogenic causes.
Anonymous said…
This is an interesting post. As a single person, it is hard to see that our actions have major effects on the world around us. It is strange to think that something that was naturally occurring became a problem once it was magnified by human activity. The solution seems to be a simple one as it has shown to have been effective in many other instances, but it then becomes a question of economics. This is where the political debate about the importance of the environment has come in. Some say that the environment is not as important as the economic state of a nation where others say that we have to have a future. Instead of making this just a topic of debate, we should instead be looking to making the world a safe place for everyone involved.
Anonymous said…
This blog was very interesting, as I was unaware of these so-called "dead zones" in our oceans. After doing further research, I found that there are approximately 405 dead zones in the world's oceans. The biggest dead zones being in the Gulf of Mexico, which contains the largest recurring hypoxic zone, which means it is low on oxygen. This dead zone occurs each summer for several weeks hurting several sea animals and environments.
Anonymous said…
This was a very interesting post; I had some prior knowledge of dead zones, but not much. I looked more into some ways to reduce the occurrence of dead zones and found that stopping fertilizer and waste runoff into lakes, rivers, and streams could significantly aid in reducing dead zones. Enacting laws to prevent this runoff would be the most efficient way to reduce dead zones. Lastly, water treatment plants could be built to prevent human and animal waste from entering rivers.
Anonymous said…
The economic detriments of dead zones must be huge. The ocean is one of Earth's most economically productive resources. Not only does it serve as a place for fishing, but it is also used in manufacturing, drilling, and tourism. Without a healthy ocean, full of diverse wildlife, all of these industries may take a large economic hit. Fortunately, the damage is reversible and the economic value of the sea can be restored, only if people care enough to fix it.
Anonymous said…
I was not aware of the existence of dead zones in bodies if water. We rely on the ocean so much for its food sources, recreation, transportation, and more, and it was disheartening to read about yet another way we are messing it up. A big contributor to these dead zones is the input of too many nutrients into the water. This can be avoided by implementing farming practices that will reduce runoff and environmental impact. A solution to this will certainly require worldwide collaboration.
Anonymous said…
I had never realized that there was parts of the ocean (and water in general) that had a lack of oxygen. I am hopeful in hearing that we have a solution, but if the wrong people come into power than these issues will come back. It is good we have already got our solution and are working on lessening the effects of Dead Zones, but it must not become another threat to be forgotten. I am worried for the countries that may not care nearly as much to fix this problem...
Anonymous said…
Reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that the ocean has to absorb can help to increase the overall health of marine ecosystems. This will help reduce the magnitude of dead zones. These zones also reduce the number of organisms living in these areas and decrease fishing. They also take a long time to become reinvigorated to the strength of what they previously were. The increase of carbon in the ocean and the formation of calcium carbonate also probably contributes to this problem, as well as overfishing and other anthroponegic activities that create water pollution.
Anonymous said…
It’s great to know that these dead zones have a potential solution. Because these dead zones have negative enviornmental and economic impacts, hopefully countries and entities will began to make proactive changes to stop dead zones. To put an end to dead zones we should stop fertilizer and waste runoff into lakes, rivers, and streams, enact laws to prevent fertilizer and waste runoff from entering water sources, and build water treatment plants to prevent human and animal waste from entering our waters.
Anonymous said…
These dead zones are very bad, and it is very good that we are slowly starting to move towards a solution for this horrible problem. In these bodies of water and in the ocean, in these dead zones, thete is a lack of oxygen, and this is causing a harm in biodiversity. We need to decrease the carbon emissions, specifically the amount of carbon dioxide in the ocean. Moreover, overfishing also makes this problem even worse with water pollution. By helping biodiversity, we can help more organisms which can also help humans with fishing.
Anonymous said…
Dead zones pose a serious threat to the environment, and fortunately enough numerous ones have been fixed. It is important to identify the causes of these zones, which you indicated as excessive fertilizer use. And since cutting down on fertilizer usage helped the Black Sea, the same methodology should be applied to the United States and other regions. Not only should fertilizer be the primary focus, but in less developed nations it is important to focus on basic runoff and sewage systems.
Anonymous said…
I was previously somewhat aware of the phenomenon occurring in oceanic environments, but I did not know of the extent and great consequences that dead zones impose onto marine ecosystems. As you said, Russia’s reduced usage of chemical fertilizers facilitated the elimination of a large dead zone in the Black Sea. This represents an example of how to reduce the sizes and impact of dead zones on the environment, and it can be applied to dead zones in domestic waters. For instance, legislation enacted to prevent or at least limit fertilizer and waste runoff into vital bodies, such as the Mississippi River Basin, compromised by these zones can be a solution. Furthermore, the proper construction and organization of water treatment plants can help prevent human and animal waste from entering our waters. These actions can be applied toward protecting marine environments from the existence of dead zones around the world.
Anonymous said…
Dead zones occur because of a process called eutrophication, which happens when a body of water gets too many nutrients, such as phosphorus and nitrogen. At normal levels, these nutrients feed the growth of an organism called cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae. With too many nutrients, however, cyanobacteria grow out of control, which can be harmful. Human activities are the main cause of these excess nutrients being washed into the ocean. Some of these human activities are an excessive amount of nutrients and runoff.
Anonymous said…
I’ve heard of agal blooms before, but I’ve never heard of these “dead zones.” Throughout everyone’s blogs, they write about scary environmental problems that are very difficult to handle, so knowing that dead zones can be dealt with and are being dealt with, is sort of a relief. I enjoyed your blog in that it sheds light on an unknown issue.
Anonymous said…
This post was very interesting. I have never heard of a dead zone. I am glad that we are moving toward a solution to this frightening problem. I believe that we need to decrease our carbon emissions since dead zones are caused by lack of oxygen which leads to severe harm of biodiversity. Also i think overhunting such as fishing is a major cause behind dead zones and that restrictions need to be placed.
Anonymous said…
As many others, I was never really informed on such dead zones. I think your post was very educating and eye opening to many students and hopefully to others as well. Something such as dead zones are things that impact our enviroment and earth in a significant way yet not enough are informed! The US should do something about this issue along with many others by starting to care more about our enviroment.
Anonymous said…
Not only is eutrophication harmful to those that need sunlight for photosynthesis, it is harmful to predators that neeed sunlight to be able to catch their prey. While eutrophication is a natural process, it is being sped up through anthropogenic means, such as using agricultural fertilizers, harvesting fish, and producing sewage. The best way that we can prevent eutrophication is by being aware of the fertilizers and pesticides that we are using in agriculture.
Cathy Kim said…
This was a really interesting post! I never really knew that there were such things as dead zones and reading your post brought more insight on the issue of eutrophication. I believe by educating others on the impact of these dead zones and how eutrophication is a natural process, but because of humans the process is sped up it increases the rate of which it occurs, we can prevent the worsening of the issue.
Anonymous said…
This was a very interesting post! It’srelieving To know that this issue has a manageable solution. It’s frustrating to think that anthropogenic activities are the catalyst for so many adverse natural processes. We are ruining the earth for ur selves. However, if we can start enforcing stricter rules and awareness about organic fertilizers over commercial fertilizers, the issue of dead zones can be greatly reduced, just as in Russia. If more companies and officials were aware of the ramifications of eutrophication, this issue could be brought to light at a much quicker rate.

Anonymous said…
It is definitely easy to underestimate the massive impact seemingly basic human action can have on the environment, the application of fertilizers very evidently one of them. The creation of these dead zones definitely damages the fishing sector of the economy. The decreased fish, crustacean, and mollusk populations already reduce the available population for catching, but the decrease in fish reproduction and increase in jellyfish population make eutrophication have longer-term impacts. Future fish populations are reduced through both the lesser amounts of reproduction and the larger jellyfish population consuming massive amounts of the fish populations. The obvious solution to these dead zones is to reduce and/or eliminate the use of fertilizers, but I think that we should definitely focus on doing so not only on an individual scale, but an industrial scale as well. Promoting commercial agricultural practices that reduce fertilizer use will perhaps make the largest impact on reducing the prevalence of eutrophication.
Anonymous said…
I had never heard of these dead zones, so I never knew this environmental problem was occurring. As oxygen is an important and necessary element for all living things, it makes sense that an area of water that is experiencing a decrease in oxygen level would experience biodiversity loss and other environmental problems. I’m glad to hear that this problem has a solution. Like Russia, other countries can begin using organic fertilizers over commercial fertilizers to try and reduce these dead zones and allow these areas of water to become healthy and vibrant once more.

Popular posts from this blog

Neel Sheth- Genetic Engineering on Food

Air Pollution Blog by Harrison Cui

Nikhil Guddati - Ice Cream and the Environment