Austin Smith - Motor Racing and The Environment
We all know the effects that automobiles have on the environment. It seems like every two seconds we are hearing about how bad fossil fuel powered machines are for the environment, how they produce immense amounts of greenhouse gases, and how electric cars are the future. While all of this may be true, sometimes we forget that there is a subsection of automobiles that, while not unregulated in the slightest, has not exactly been eco-friendly in the past: motor racing.
Motor racing is not exactly a clean sport, ecologically. It is completely centered around making extremely inefficient machines become more efficient, all for the purpose of going faster and burning even more fuel in the process. Your average car may get 20-30 MPG on the highway, but what about these machines? Formula 1 cars are usually recorded at getting around 2-4 MPG! These engines are very inefficient (they need to be to go this fast) but they are used to irresponsibly that they go through fuel extremely quickly. This is why Formula 1 has implemented regulations to help the sport be more environmentally friendly. One of these regulations is that the engine capacity for these machines has been slashed from 2.4 liters to just 1.6 liters, and these motors are now being assisted by a hybrid system, ensuring that the cars do not lose any power in hopes of being more eco-friendly.
Also, since most of Europe has adopted gasoline policy's requiring the substitution of biofuels for a percentage of gasoline (such as 10% ethanol/gallon), Formula 1 has also created regulations requiring similar restrictions for their cars. Biofuels still create similar CO2 emissions to their fossil-fuel counterparts, but since biofuels come from plants, and plants use CO2 during photosynthesis, we are able to learn that the very things that makeup biofuels (plants) are helping reduce the environmental impact that the fuels are creating. Biofuels are better for the environment than fossil fuels because the plants that are required to make them are helping decrease their CO2 emissions into the atmosphere when they undergo photosynthesis.
While Formula 1 racing is not very popular in the US, there is one motorsport that is extremely popular stateside: NASCAR. While the organization has not exactly had the ecosystem in mind in the past (it took them until 2007 to ban lead-based fuels when the US had legislation passed in 1973), they have recently made efforts to promote more eco-friendly practices among their fanbase. NASCAR has teamed up with the United States Environmental Protection Agency to promote high-MPG cars at races to encourage their fans to purchase cars which use less fuel and, in effect, create fewer greenhouse gases than their gas-guzzling counterparts. Another effort being made by the popular racing organization is the use of carbon credits. The Hall of Fame racing team has committed to purchasing carbon credits to offset the carbon emissions that it creates, whether it be during testing, practice, or racing. While it is debatable whether these efforts will actually make a difference in the foundation's greenhouse gas emissions, it is certainly a step in the right direction.
Even though motorsport racing does not have a massive effect on greenhouse gas emissions compared to the rest of the world (one weekend on NASCAR racing uses 6,000 gallons of fuel while the US alone uses 400 million in a day) it is important to make sure that every player in this ecological game is playing fairly. Another factor that is important to consider is that many of the technological advances in Formula 1 race cars trickle down to consumers' cars, meaning more efficient and environmentally-friendly cars are possible when Formula 1 implements regulations to its racing teams. While it is scary to think that many of the previously mentioned changes have only happened recently, it is good to see that these teams are taking steps in the right direction to contribute less to climate change. Our job will be putting increasing pressure on these organizations to keep enacting regulations to lessen their impact on the environment.
Questions:
-Do you think that motor racing firms should enact more or less legislation to keep improve their ecological footprint? Why?
-How many of these regulations do you think should "trickle down" to vehicles available to consumers?
-What other regulations have been enacted to lessen these companies' impacts on the environment?
-What side effects could these regulations have on the environment?
Sources:
https://www.racecar-engineering.com/technology-explained/formula-1-and-the-environment/
http://biofuel.org.uk/greenhouse-gas-emissions.html
https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/nascar-environment2.htm
https://archive.epa.gov/epa/aboutepa/epa-takes-final-step-phaseout-leaded-gasoline.html
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-motor-f1-mercedes-hamilton/motor-racing-mercedes-strategist-hails-hamilton-for-finishing-in-australia-idUSKCN1R12GY
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/45522628
https://www.enjoyillinois.com/plan-your-trip/things-to-do/sports/auto-racing-in-illinois/
http://www.espn.com/racing/nascar/story/_/id/25925314/nascar-disqualify-illegal-cars-move-squash-cheating
Comments